Apr 08, 2011 mark galli, senior managing editor of christianity today, wrote an article titled the problem with christus victor. Feb 10, 2016 what is the christus victor theory of the atonement. At first, i was quite disappointed with what i read. That is, adam and eves decisiontogether with our own sinfulness and deathensure that all humanity will end. Aulen reinterpreted the classic ransom theory of atonement, which says that christ s death. An historical study of the three main types of the idea of. A christus victor account places the gospel as part of the victory, according with the central idea of christs defeat of sin. Christus victor is also called as the ransom theory of the atonement. That is only a part but the main part proclaimed over and over again in scripture is the idea of sacrifice. I think it is important however to not conflate the substitutionary theory of the atonement as being synonymous with atonement theory altogether. Both lewis and macdonald subscribed not to the calvinist penal substitution theory of atonement, but rather the ransom, or christus victor theory.
Christus victor is a book by gustaf aulen published in 1931, presenting a study of theories of atonement in christianity. An historical study of the three main types of the idea of atonement 1931, a book that has had considerable influence in the study of theology on the issue of the atonement. Christus victor latin for christ is victorious is a view of the atonement closely related to and often lumped together with the ransom view that was discussed in last weeks blog post. In his book, aulen identifies three main types of atonement theories. His classic view emphasizes christ as the victor over the evil powers of the world, making possible reconciliation between humanity and god. Aulen reinterpretated the classic ransom theory of atonement, which says that christs death is a ransom to the powers of evil, which had held humankind in their dominion. A major place where these matters are being discussed is here, and you are free to join. Christus victor is a book by gustaf aulen published in english in 1931, presenting a study of theories of atonement in. Life after death experience nde with steve gardipee, vietnam war story one of the best ndes duration. The christus victor theory or ransom theory evidence. Christus victor is thus the theory of the early church fathers. For aulen, christus victor was a doublesided theory of atonement, with god both as subject reconciler and object reconciled.
Feb 20, 20 the reason being, that the christus victor theory works perfectly well without god having deceived satan. I was wondering what your views on the christus victor theory of atonement are. Aulen applies history of ideas methodology to historical theology. The classic idea, or ransom theory, or what can now simply be called christus victor, clearly rises to the top. Christus victor project gutenberg selfpublishing ebooks. Use features like bookmarks, note taking and highlighting while reading christus victor. Aulen argued that the christus victor model of atonement was espoused by the early church fathers and is therefore closer to the truth than anselms satisfaction or commercial theory, formulated in the eleventh century. Christus victor christ the victor is a view of the atonement taken from the title of gustaf aulens groundbreaking book, first published in 1931, where he drew attention back to the early churchs ransom theory. Can christus victor atonement theory be combined with. By appearances, the book is little more than a long, historical survey of the doctrine of the atonement, showing how various views of the atonement have been. Many of the major criticisms of crucifixion of the warrior god that have been raised since it was published four weeks ago have come from folks who advocate rene girards understanding of the atonement. The classical view of the atonement sees jesus not so much as a ransom payment but as the ransomer, the enactor of liberation, the one who sets captives free. His very first sentence sums it all up and its completely vague. Atonement theology consists of various doctrines concerning the reconciliation of god and humanity, especially as that reconciliation is worked out through the life, suf.
The idea of the atonement for gregory continues even further and does not stop merely at christus victor but well look at his ideas as well as. Confronting atonement theology united methodist insight. Aulen asserts that in traditional histories of the doctrine of the atonement only two. Through christ god revealed the definitive truth about himself rom 5. May 17, 2017 christus victor atonement and girards scapegoat theory. As you can tell from the title, eventually i am going to bring this discussion back to the idea of christus victor a term first coined in 1931 by gustaf aulen although the idea goes back much, much farther.
Aulen argues that the early church fathers did not see christs death as a ransom paid to satan for the rights to human souls, but rather as a victory over sin, death and the devil and hence a liberation of humanity from their bondage. Christus victor in scholarship few would deny that christ victor was the dominant view in the early church. Though theologically dense, this small book will enliven the hearts and quicken the imagination of readers diligent enough to spend a few hours immersed in christus victor. Jul 09, 2012 christus victor is the name given to the theory that held sway among christians for about 1,000 years until anselm argued for substitutionary atonement. In it aulen identifies three main types of atonement theories. The theory of penal substitinary atonement states that sin incurred the wrath of god, and that christ bore the brunt of this wrath to reconcile us with the father. The current latin atonement theory is something in between christus victor and satisfaction, i believe. Criticisms which have been made of the narrative christus victor theory.
The christus victor view of the atonement greg boyd reknew. While this view has lost a major following in recent years, gustaf aulen has been a notable, modern proponent. As promised in my last blog post about atonement theology, i want to share what ive found when researching the early church fathers view on the death of christ. I begin, then, with an example of the first option cited above. A related practical advantage of the christus victor view of the atonement is that, in sharp contrast to the hyperindividualistic outlook of most americans, the christus victor model puts on center stage the easilyoverlooked demonic dimension of all fallen social structures. My countryman gustaf aulen wrote a book 83 years ago called christus victor when he argued that the church fathers didnt believe in penal substitution but in a classical atonement framework which he calls christus victor. Hardly an atonement discussion goes by that i dont hear an evangelical say they doubt the usefulness of substitutionary atonement and now favor christus victor. In his book he states that he sees this thing as christ against satan thats it. Im sure youve noticed the rising popularity of the christus victor theory of the atonement. The salvation of god and the cross of christ fuller. The earliest was what aulen called the classic view of the atonement, more commonly known as the ransom theory, or since aulens work, it is known sometimes as the christus victor theory. Sep 5, gustaf aulens classic work, christus victor, has long been a standard text on the atonement. Christus victor is a book by gustaf aulen published in english in 1931, presenting a study of theories of atonement in christianity.
G download it once and read it on your kindle device, pc, phones or tablets. It assumes that a perfect repentance is sufficient to atone for sin. Classically, the christus victor theory of atonement is widely considered to be the. No christus victor here atonement according to the. Most progressive christians have an atonement theology. In christus victor, the atonement is viewed as divine conflict and victory over the hostile powers that hold humanity in subjection. The term christus victor, latin for christ is the conqueror, originated with a 1931 book by gustaf aulen, which presents a theory of christs work of atonement. The christus victor theory presents an aspect of the atonement but is inadequate on its own. What is the christus victor theory of the atonement. Gustaf aulens classic work, christus victor, has long been a standard text on the atonement. Available on kindle ebook and can be read on any device with the free kindle.
Jesus came to bring an end to satans regime and reclaim the earth, humans and the entire creation as the domain in which god is king. In his death, christ entered into the fathers condemnation of sin, condemned sin, and by this, confessed it. What stroke me most, however, is the clear contrast of legal continuity, divine discontinuity of pst and legal discontinuity, divine continuity of christus victor. That is, adam and eves decisiontogether with our own sinfulness and deathensure that all humanity will end up forever in the grasp of the devil in. Apr 07, 2011 hardly an atonement discussion goes by that i dont hear an evangelical say they doubt the usefulness of substitutionary atonement and now favor christus victor. Tom wright explains why we shouldnt separate christus victor and penal substitution views of the atonement from each other or the rest of the gospels. The term christus victor comes from the title of gustaf aulens groundbreaking book first published in 1931 where he drew attention back to this classic early church understanding of the atonement.
Christus victor and the atonement unorthodox faith. Christus victor atonement and girards scapegoat theory. The penal theorypenal substitution theory of the atonement. Get this book, and it will change your views profoundly on the subject. Denny weaver begins with the classic version of the christus victor atonement theory and reworks it into what he calls the narrative christus victor atonement theory. Ive been surprised by the number of times this question has come up of late.
Roger olson writes, the earliest theory or model of atonement in christian history was the socalled ransom theory christus victor. Nov 29, 2018 the christus victor view of the atonement. I have discovered that its a good summary of what i have. Nov 03, 2017 can christus victor atonement theory be combined with penal substitution. Christus victor theory of the atonement reasonable faith. There are actually minor distinctions between the two theories, but for simplicity, we will combine these two, because they are so similar.
Atonement theory is attempting to describe how christ saves us. The christus victor model shows that christ battled for us against the destructive powers that had us in their bondage death. This book explores what the earliest churchs model of the atonement was which was the chrisus victor or the classic model as gustaf called it. Atonement governmental view project gutenberg self.
Closely related to the ransom captive theory, the christus victor theory understands that humanity will be forever subject to satan due to adam and eves decision to yield to him in the garden. Christus victor is the name given to the theory that held sway among christians for about 1,000 years until anselm argued for substitutionary atonement. The point is that the incarnation of the son of god was first and foremost a military maneuver. I think much better anthologies of thought on atonement theory have been written, but the importance this book has in bringing the christus victor view back into. Erickson notes that this theory was the standard view in the early history of the church. I wanted to learn more about this view, so i bought and read this book. The christus victor theory of the atonement emphasizes christs triumphing over satan and liberating us from bondage to sin and corruption. This theory of atonement set out by gustaf aulen in 1931 in his book christus victor is a reinterpretation of the ransom theory of atonement. The reason being, that the christus victor theory works perfectly well without god having deceived satan. The eastern catholics do indeed believe christus victor.
The christus victor view of the atonement greg boyd. It can only be cancelled by an infinite satisfaction through the death of yeshua, the sinless godman. Jul 18, 2019 sep 5, gustaf aulens classic work, christus victor, has long been a standard text on the atonement. Jan 02, 2020 aulen argued that the christus victor model of atonement was espoused by the early church fathers and is therefore closer to the truth than anselms satisfaction or commercial theory, formulated in the eleventh century.
However, the christus victor motif avoids some of the problems that the ransom theory falls into. Four views, this book is the classic explanation and defense of the christus victor view of the atonement. The truth of the matter is that the church fathers reflected the wide diversity of. Is christus victor equally accepted by the church with. It is has always been the standard view in eastern orthodoxy, but it is making inroads in mennonite circles and in the left wing of the evangelical movement who are trying to develop nonpenal and nonviolent ways of understanding the atonement. An historical study of the three main types of the idea of atonement kindle edition by aulen, gustaf, dindinger, j. I have discovered that its a good summary of what i have heard throughout my life within the church. The christus victor view of the atonement cannot be understood without. Although aulens contention, as well as his threefold typology of atonement theory, have been criticized as overly simplified, the publication of aulens book in. But, then, as the author gustav aulen points out, even martin luther, the father of the reformation, also rejected the latin, or substitution theory. His book christus victor has established itself as one of the key reference points in contemporary discussion.
Christ did indeed triumph over satan through his death and his work is first presented as crushing satans head genesis 3. This being the case, ntws understanding of the cross is open to the same criticism that is directed to the christus victor theory of the atonement. As someone who believes christus victor ought to be the umbrella atonement motif for the christian faith, this post is a response to that article. The theory of penal substitinary atonement states that sin incurred the wrath of god, and that christ bore. A second feature of governmental theory is the scope of the atonement. Where are all you people getting your interpretations on aulens theory is it hinted at in the rest of his book. The problem with christus victor christianity today. Most of us embrace either the moral example theory of the atonement or the christus victor theory of the atonement. Anselm himself went on to explicate the satisfaction view of atonement, now espoused by the roman catholic church. He also draws a distinction between christus victor, wherein the atonement is from above, from the side of god, and other views, where the work is offered up from the side of man. The christus victor model shows that christ battled for us against the destructive powers that had us in their bondage death, great book. Most of the criticisms of the regular satisfaction theory apply here as well, with minimal modification. But, using the same logic, a single, minor positive act by a human would bring about an infinite amount of good.
But for now, we should take a quick survey of the history of the doctrine of the atonement. The theory assumes that because god is infinite, even a single, minor human sin incurs an infinite debt to god. The two main theories are penal substitinary atonement, and christus victor. As boyd says, the idea of ransom in scripture was likely not meant to be taken literally. The term christus victor comes from the title of gustaf aulens groundbreaking book 1st published in 31 which drew attention to early church understanding of. As tony jones explains, cv falls under a broader umbrella called the ransom theory. Christus victor explores the meaning and traces the history of each of the three major theories of the atonement.